I believe the sample sizes are much too small for that sort of breakdown. The closest you could get is by Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander. And even that will be limited. Check out the Appendices file (Appendix A) in the Summary File documentation…
You're correct: the ACS summary files do not have this information, so the PUMS is your best bet. IPUMS-USA has county codes, but if a county you're examining can't be identified in the PUMS data, you can use the CHAS data, a special tabulation of ACS…
Thank you so much! Is it also safe to assume that there are probably not a lot of instances where Block Group level estimates from ACS 5-year summary files are used in modeling because of their high MOEs?
Can anyone explain why some data is available on data.census.gov but not in the summary files?
For example, Table B06007 (Place Of Birth By Language Spoken At Home And Ability To Speak English In The United States). It appears to be available on data…
The "Detailed Tables" from the ACS (i.e., the ACS Summary Files) include "geographic components" that allow you to breakdown data for certain levels further by metro / non-metro / micropolitan / urban / rural and a few other geographic…
Glenn is correct. NHGIS and Social Explorer redistribute the published ACS Detailed Tables (i.e., Summary File) data. I don't know of published ACS tables that cross-tabulate poverty ratio by race. In any case, NHGIS doesn't have any. I'd guess that…
As I understand, the Census API and data.census.gov don't serve any block group data from ACS summary files prior to 2013 (or so). But all releases of 5-year summary files have included block group data, and there are tables at that level for families…
I am working on building a synthetic population that includes group quarters and am stumped by a pretty large inconsistency between the ACS 5-year and decennial census reported group quarter populations in the block group that contains the Cook County…