Education Attainment for everyone, not just those over 25

Have you tried these tables:

B14005
SEX BY SCHOOL ENROLLMENT BY EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT BY EMPLOYMENT STATUS FOR THE POPULATION 16 TO 19 YEARS
Universe: Population 16 to 19 years

B15001
SEX BY AGE BY EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT FOR THE POPULATION 18 YEARS AND OVER
Universe: Population 18 years and over

Check out the documentation. I find it easy for me to just pull up the table shell excel file and do a Find All for a key word (in this case "attainment") then look through the available tables. 

Table Shells are found here:
www.census.gov/.../table-shells.html

Thanks for the input. I have the shell and tables and even built my own hybrid table, so I can sort find, etc. I do this first. Then on a potential table to use, I download the column-metadata for it and choose all potential fields then pull the data from an API to see if there is data for that field (sometimes it's blank). I then have valid fields for that table (valid for the county level).  I do this by table type (because the API format varies by type). I've spent 10-plus hours on subject tables so far this weekend. I then put all the valid subject table fields into one API call (max is 50 fields) so I can pull down all valid fields for the subject tables I want.  B14005 does not have data at the county level. B15001 has valid data not included in the 25 and over (so it's a missing piece which is great). However, with thousands of tables, it's possible to build almost anything. Ed is a very basic and important measure there should be a field for it without searching for all the pieces to hopefully build the total measure. I think it should match enrollment that uses Age 3 or higher, and actually, there should be a top level with no age limit at all for both enrollment and attainment with breakout by age, race etc etc. 

So....  I think Census data is very important and has a direct impact on many lives. Has some shortcomings which are worth fighting to get fixed. And in these cases, I think it's an easy fix as the raw data is already there. Trying to make the world a slightly better place, not just complaining. Offering no offense to anyone.

Thanks for the input. I have the shell and tables and even built my own hybrid table, so I can sort find, etc. I do this first. Then on a potential table to use, I download the column-metadata for it and choose all potential fields then pull the data from an API to see if there is data for that field (sometimes it's blank). I then have valid fields for that table (valid for the county level).  I do this by table type (because the API format varies by type). I've spent 10-plus hours on subject tables so far this weekend. I then put all the valid subject table fields into one API call (max is 50 fields) so I can pull down all valid fields for the subject tables I want.  B14005 does not have data at the county level. B15001 has valid data not included in the 25 and over (so it's a missing piece which is great). However, with thousands of tables, it's possible to build almost anything. Ed is a very basic and important measure there should be a field for it without searching for all the pieces to hopefully build the total measure. I think it should match enrollment that uses Age 3 or higher, and actually, there should be a top level with no age limit at all for both enrollment and attainment with breakout by age, race etc etc. 

So....  I think Census data is very important and has a direct impact on many lives. Has some shortcomings which are worth fighting to get fixed. And in these cases, I think it's an easy fix as the raw data is already there. Trying to make the world a slightly better place, not just complaining. Offering no offense to anyone.