The 2025 ACS Data Users Conference will be held on May 29, 2025 (virtual day) and June 3, 2025 (in-person in DC)
American Community Survey Data Users Group
Search for topics, people, or keywords
Sign Up
Log in
Site
Search for topics, people, or keywords
User
Home
Discussion Forum
ACS Resources
Webinars
Conferences
Steering Committee
More
Cancel
Home
Discussion Forum
ACS Resources
Webinars
Conferences
About
More
Cancel
Details
Views
7557 views
Replies
10 replies
Subscribers
541 subscribers
Users
0 members are here
Labels
placer county
california
median age
Small area data
Related Census Bureau Resources
Related Forum Threads
Suspect value
Bernie
over 8 years ago
I've found a very suspect value in table B01002D, column B01002D_002, which is MEDIAN AGE BY SEX (ASIAN ALONE), for Males. In Placer County, CA, census tract 210.38, block group 4 (060610210384), the value for the median age is 115+. You can check it out here:
factfinder.census.gov/.../0500000US06061.15000
This is the only median age value for any geography in the country greater than 99. I'll e-mail Census, and see if they have any further information.
Parents
Beth Jarosz
over 8 years ago
From a strictly technical perspective, the MOE note states: "An '***' entry in the margin of error column indicates that the median falls in the lowest interval or upper interval of an open-ended distribution. A statistical test is not appropriate."
The 2013 value for male median age for that tract is: 70.0 median (+/-94.7). Such a wide range implies an extraordinarily small sample size.
But from a real-world perspective, it's hard to believe that tract has such a high median age. Satellite images show that most of the tract is your standard, suburban housing. There's a major apartment complex in the tract that advertises "after school programs."
115+ would be a suspiciously high median even in a community entirely comprised of retirement residences or assisted-living facilities. In a run-of-the-mill suburban block group, I'm going to venture to suggest that it's a virtual impossibility.
This case speaks clearly to the problems with ACS survey results at the smallest areas of geography (or for small population groups).
Keep us posted on what you learn!
Cancel
Up
0
Down
Reply
Cancel
Reply
Beth Jarosz
over 8 years ago
From a strictly technical perspective, the MOE note states: "An '***' entry in the margin of error column indicates that the median falls in the lowest interval or upper interval of an open-ended distribution. A statistical test is not appropriate."
The 2013 value for male median age for that tract is: 70.0 median (+/-94.7). Such a wide range implies an extraordinarily small sample size.
But from a real-world perspective, it's hard to believe that tract has such a high median age. Satellite images show that most of the tract is your standard, suburban housing. There's a major apartment complex in the tract that advertises "after school programs."
115+ would be a suspiciously high median even in a community entirely comprised of retirement residences or assisted-living facilities. In a run-of-the-mill suburban block group, I'm going to venture to suggest that it's a virtual impossibility.
This case speaks clearly to the problems with ACS survey results at the smallest areas of geography (or for small population groups).
Keep us posted on what you learn!
Cancel
Up
0
Down
Reply
Cancel
Children
No Data