American Community Survey Data Users Group
Search for topics, people, or keywords
Sign Up
Log in
Site
Search for topics, people, or keywords
User
Home
Discussion Forum
ACS Resources
Webinars
Conferences
Steering Committee
More
Cancel
Home
Discussion Forum
ACS Resources
Webinars
Conferences
About
More
Cancel
Details
Views
27355 views
Replies
20 replies
Subscribers
540 subscribers
Users
0 members are here
Labels
Small area data
Related Census Bureau Resources
Related Forum Threads
Calculating MOEs from derived ACS estimates
Mark Mather
over 11 years ago
Over the years, we have heard from a lot of people interested in getting an easy-to-use tool that would help people calculate margins of error from derived ACS data (e.g., data combined across categories or geographies). There are several organizations that have developed some basic applications that might be useful. Here are the links:
sdcclearinghouse.wordpress.com/.../
www.psc.isr.umich.edu/.../
pad.human.cornell.edu/.../
fyi.uwex.edu/.../
www.demography.state.mn.us/.../StatisticalCalculationsMenu.xls
If you are using a different application in your organization, feel free to post it here.
Parents
Stan Drezek
over 11 years ago
When I read Nancy Gemignani's presentation ( See the presentation at
www.dof.ca.gov/.../Basics_of_ACS_Nov2012.pdf
slides 13-27.) I noticed that slide 15 suggested a recommendation of below 33% is a good "Relative MOE" and anything above to use with caution.
The Compass handbooks say to use CVs > 15% with caution. Since the CV is the ratio of the SE to the estimate and the MOE is 1.645 * the SE then the Compass recommendation would imply anything over about 25% Relative MOE (i.e. 15% * 1.645) should be interpreted with caution.
Recognizing the context affects the interpretation, what rules of thumb are others using?
stan drezek
Cancel
Up
0
Down
Reply
Cancel
Reply
Stan Drezek
over 11 years ago
When I read Nancy Gemignani's presentation ( See the presentation at
www.dof.ca.gov/.../Basics_of_ACS_Nov2012.pdf
slides 13-27.) I noticed that slide 15 suggested a recommendation of below 33% is a good "Relative MOE" and anything above to use with caution.
The Compass handbooks say to use CVs > 15% with caution. Since the CV is the ratio of the SE to the estimate and the MOE is 1.645 * the SE then the Compass recommendation would imply anything over about 25% Relative MOE (i.e. 15% * 1.645) should be interpreted with caution.
Recognizing the context affects the interpretation, what rules of thumb are others using?
stan drezek
Cancel
Up
0
Down
Reply
Cancel
Children
No Data