American Community Survey Data Users Group
Search for topics, people, or keywords
Sign Up
Log in
Site
Search for topics, people, or keywords
User
Home
Discussion Forum
ACS Resources
Webinars
Conferences
Steering Committee
More
Cancel
Home
Discussion Forum
ACS Resources
Webinars
Conferences
About
More
Cancel
Details
Views
27355 views
Replies
20 replies
Subscribers
540 subscribers
Users
0 members are here
Labels
Small area data
Related Census Bureau Resources
Related Forum Threads
Calculating MOEs from derived ACS estimates
Mark Mather
over 11 years ago
Over the years, we have heard from a lot of people interested in getting an easy-to-use tool that would help people calculate margins of error from derived ACS data (e.g., data combined across categories or geographies). There are several organizations that have developed some basic applications that might be useful. Here are the links:
sdcclearinghouse.wordpress.com/.../
www.psc.isr.umich.edu/.../
pad.human.cornell.edu/.../
fyi.uwex.edu/.../
www.demography.state.mn.us/.../StatisticalCalculationsMenu.xls
If you are using a different application in your organization, feel free to post it here.
Parents
Korey Darling
over 11 years ago
We currently follow the “>15% CV use with caution” standard recommended by the Compass Guides in our office but I have been doing a little research to explore the idea using of tiered reliability categories especially for working with small area estimates (tracts, zip codes). So far I have found three sources that provide tiered categories, but they are all a little different.
1. State of Washington, Office of Financial Management (I think this is the State Data Center?)
www.ofm.wa.gov/.../ofm_acs_user_guide.pdf
Good: CV
Fair: 15%
Use with caution: CV > 30%
2. ESRI
www.esri.com/.../reliability-flags
High Reliability: CV
Medium Reliability: 12%
Low Reliability: CV>40% (considered very unreliable)
3. Missouri State Data Center
mcdc.missouri.edu/.../usage-notes.php
Most Reliable: CV less than 9.1 (RMOE less than 15%)
Middle Category: CV between 9.1 and 21.2 (RMOE between 15%-35%)
Least Reliable: CV 21.2 or greater (RMOE greater than 35%)
I am interested in hearing other’s responses to Stan’s question and also learning about whether anyone else uses tiered reliability guidelines and what your breakdowns are.
Cancel
Up
0
Down
Reply
Cancel
Reply
Korey Darling
over 11 years ago
We currently follow the “>15% CV use with caution” standard recommended by the Compass Guides in our office but I have been doing a little research to explore the idea using of tiered reliability categories especially for working with small area estimates (tracts, zip codes). So far I have found three sources that provide tiered categories, but they are all a little different.
1. State of Washington, Office of Financial Management (I think this is the State Data Center?)
www.ofm.wa.gov/.../ofm_acs_user_guide.pdf
Good: CV
Fair: 15%
Use with caution: CV > 30%
2. ESRI
www.esri.com/.../reliability-flags
High Reliability: CV
Medium Reliability: 12%
Low Reliability: CV>40% (considered very unreliable)
3. Missouri State Data Center
mcdc.missouri.edu/.../usage-notes.php
Most Reliable: CV less than 9.1 (RMOE less than 15%)
Middle Category: CV between 9.1 and 21.2 (RMOE between 15%-35%)
Least Reliable: CV 21.2 or greater (RMOE greater than 35%)
I am interested in hearing other’s responses to Stan’s question and also learning about whether anyone else uses tiered reliability guidelines and what your breakdowns are.
Cancel
Up
0
Down
Reply
Cancel
Children
No Data