The 2025 ACS Data Users Conference will be held on May 29, 2025 (virtual day) and June 3, 2025 (in-person in DC)
American Community Survey Data Users Group
Search for topics, people, or keywords
Sign Up
Log in
Site
Search for topics, people, or keywords
User
Home
Discussion Forum
ACS Resources
Webinars
Conferences
Steering Committee
More
Cancel
Home
Discussion Forum
ACS Resources
Webinars
Conferences
About
More
Cancel
Details
Views
27588 views
Replies
20 replies
Subscribers
541 subscribers
Users
0 members are here
Labels
Small area data
Related Census Bureau Resources
Related Forum Threads
Calculating MOEs from derived ACS estimates
Mark Mather
over 11 years ago
Over the years, we have heard from a lot of people interested in getting an easy-to-use tool that would help people calculate margins of error from derived ACS data (e.g., data combined across categories or geographies). There are several organizations that have developed some basic applications that might be useful. Here are the links:
sdcclearinghouse.wordpress.com/.../
www.psc.isr.umich.edu/.../
pad.human.cornell.edu/.../
fyi.uwex.edu/.../
www.demography.state.mn.us/.../StatisticalCalculationsMenu.xls
If you are using a different application in your organization, feel free to post it here.
Parents
George Malachowski
over 11 years ago
Hello, thank you for all of these resources. After some deliberation, our organization decided to use the following guidelines when publishing the estimates:
Indiviudal Estimate CVs:
Excellent- 0-10%
Good- 10-30%
Fair- 30-60%
Poor- >61%
Source:
Ashenfelter, Kathleen, "Study Series: Data Reliability Indicator Cases on the Coefficient of Variation: Results from the Second Round of Testing," Statistical Research Division, U.S. Census Bureau, April 2010.
For groups of estimates (such as all of the Census Tracts in a county:
High- >80% of geographies' CV
Medium- 60-80% of geographies' CV
Low-
Source:
Michael Stasinic et al, "Quality Rating Classification of 5-year ACS MYES Estimated by Population Size Groupings and in Comparison with Census 2000 Long Form Estimates," Decennial Statistical Studies Division, U.S. Census Bureau, May 2011.
Cancel
Up
0
Down
Reply
Cancel
Reply
George Malachowski
over 11 years ago
Hello, thank you for all of these resources. After some deliberation, our organization decided to use the following guidelines when publishing the estimates:
Indiviudal Estimate CVs:
Excellent- 0-10%
Good- 10-30%
Fair- 30-60%
Poor- >61%
Source:
Ashenfelter, Kathleen, "Study Series: Data Reliability Indicator Cases on the Coefficient of Variation: Results from the Second Round of Testing," Statistical Research Division, U.S. Census Bureau, April 2010.
For groups of estimates (such as all of the Census Tracts in a county:
High- >80% of geographies' CV
Medium- 60-80% of geographies' CV
Low-
Source:
Michael Stasinic et al, "Quality Rating Classification of 5-year ACS MYES Estimated by Population Size Groupings and in Comparison with Census 2000 Long Form Estimates," Decennial Statistical Studies Division, U.S. Census Bureau, May 2011.
Cancel
Up
0
Down
Reply
Cancel
Children
No Data