The 2025 ACS Data Users Conference will be held on May 29, 2025 (virtual day) and June 3, 2025 (in-person in DC)
American Community Survey Data Users Group
Search for topics, people, or keywords
Sign Up
Log in
Site
Search for topics, people, or keywords
User
Home
Discussion Forum
ACS Resources
Webinars
Conferences
Steering Committee
More
Cancel
Home
Discussion Forum
ACS Resources
Webinars
Conferences
About
More
Cancel
Details
Views
3005 views
Replies
3 replies
Subscribers
541 subscribers
Users
0 members are here
Labels
Small area data
Related Census Bureau Resources
Related Forum Threads
Discrepancy in San Francisco population?
chaosgame
over 10 years ago
I'm comparing Google public data (
http://bit.ly/1ibkhwL)
vs. acf tabulated data.
Specifically, I'm looking at a big jump that appears between 2007 and 2008 in ACF data:
factfinder2.census.gov/.../0500000US06075
factfinder2.census.gov/.../0500000US06075
There's a jump from 764,976 to 808,976 that appears in ACF data, but not on Google data (799,185 to 808,001). From 2008 on, the data is very close, but not 2007 and below.
I'm trying to use the ACF PUMS data to break down SF demographics, and I'm stuck here trying to understand where this discrepancy came from.
FWIW, the numbers on the bay area census site agree with Google (
www.bayareacensus.ca.gov/.../SanFranciscoCounty.htm)
Parents
Matthew Brault
over 8 years ago
This has to do with Population estimate vintages. The ACS number you reference is controlled to the population estimate for that year, from that year's vintage. So the 2007 ACS population is controlled to the 2007 vintage estimate of the population in San Francisco County on July 1, 2007. The 2008 estimate is controlled to the 2008 vintage estimate of the population in San Francisco County on July 1, 2008.
As a comparison, the google data appears to have pulled the 2009 vintage estimates for the population on July 1 for every year in the decade.
The difference is that one is the 2009 vintage estimate for 2007 and the other is the 2007 vintange estimate for 2007.
The different vintages can be found at:
www.census.gov/.../CO-EST2007-01-06.xls
www.census.gov/.../CO-EST2008-01-06.xls
www.census.gov/.../CO-EST2009-01-06.xls
Cancel
Up
0
Down
Reply
Cancel
Reply
Matthew Brault
over 8 years ago
This has to do with Population estimate vintages. The ACS number you reference is controlled to the population estimate for that year, from that year's vintage. So the 2007 ACS population is controlled to the 2007 vintage estimate of the population in San Francisco County on July 1, 2007. The 2008 estimate is controlled to the 2008 vintage estimate of the population in San Francisco County on July 1, 2008.
As a comparison, the google data appears to have pulled the 2009 vintage estimates for the population on July 1 for every year in the decade.
The difference is that one is the 2009 vintage estimate for 2007 and the other is the 2007 vintange estimate for 2007.
The different vintages can be found at:
www.census.gov/.../CO-EST2007-01-06.xls
www.census.gov/.../CO-EST2008-01-06.xls
www.census.gov/.../CO-EST2009-01-06.xls
Cancel
Up
0
Down
Reply
Cancel
Children
No Data