The 2025 ACS Data Users Conference will be held on May 29, 2025 (virtual day) and June 3, 2025 (in-person in DC)
American Community Survey Data Users Group
Search for topics, people, or keywords
Sign Up
Log in
Site
Search for topics, people, or keywords
User
Home
Discussion Forum
ACS Resources
Webinars
Conferences
Steering Committee
More
Cancel
Home
Discussion Forum
ACS Resources
Webinars
Conferences
About
More
Cancel
Details
Views
4250 views
Replies
5 replies
Subscribers
541 subscribers
Users
0 members are here
Labels
retired
PUMS
Related Census Bureau Resources
Related Forum Threads
Retired people in 2012 1-year ACS PUMS
Adriana
over 10 years ago
Hi, I'm trying to identify the retired people (if possible) in the ACS2012- 1 year database. Does anyone know what variable/variables should I use identify these people? I've searched in the PUMS data dictionary, but i had no luck.
Any help on this is highly appreciated!
Thanks,
Adriana
Parents
Adriana
over 10 years ago
Thank you all for your answers! I’ve tried to compare the retired number resulting from the combination of variables ESR, RETP and AGE with the one published by Social Security Administration (
www.socialsecurity.gov/.../OAbenies.html)
- 36,719,288 retired workers in 2012. An overall incidence (among all indiv. 0+y.o.) would be around 12%.
-> If I filter by ESR=6 and AGEP>=62 and RETP>0 I obtain about 16,000,000 retired people, so about 5.3% within all indiv. 0+ y.o. I think this difference is too big.
-> It seems that only 8% of indiv (24,068,309 ) are receiving retirement incomes greater than 0 (RETP>0). So I have to exclude this variable from my filter in order to get closer to 12%= the overall incidence of retired.
-> If I take into consideration the variables: ESR=6 and AGEP>=62 I obtain 41,166,421 retired people, about 13.5% of all indiv. Here are also included, as Galatia noted, those housewives, seasonal workers and other groups besides retred. How can I exclude them?
Another question is: should I use different ages when targeting retired? For axemple women and men have the same standard retirement age? What about those who retire earlier than the standard age?
Thanks,
Adriana
Cancel
Up
0
Down
Reply
Cancel
Reply
Adriana
over 10 years ago
Thank you all for your answers! I’ve tried to compare the retired number resulting from the combination of variables ESR, RETP and AGE with the one published by Social Security Administration (
www.socialsecurity.gov/.../OAbenies.html)
- 36,719,288 retired workers in 2012. An overall incidence (among all indiv. 0+y.o.) would be around 12%.
-> If I filter by ESR=6 and AGEP>=62 and RETP>0 I obtain about 16,000,000 retired people, so about 5.3% within all indiv. 0+ y.o. I think this difference is too big.
-> It seems that only 8% of indiv (24,068,309 ) are receiving retirement incomes greater than 0 (RETP>0). So I have to exclude this variable from my filter in order to get closer to 12%= the overall incidence of retired.
-> If I take into consideration the variables: ESR=6 and AGEP>=62 I obtain 41,166,421 retired people, about 13.5% of all indiv. Here are also included, as Galatia noted, those housewives, seasonal workers and other groups besides retred. How can I exclude them?
Another question is: should I use different ages when targeting retired? For axemple women and men have the same standard retirement age? What about those who retire earlier than the standard age?
Thanks,
Adriana
Cancel
Up
0
Down
Reply
Cancel
Children
No Data