Dear Cliff,
My reading of the webpage is that the 7000 applies to all levels of geography. This would typically rule out tracts, some city/towns (County Subdivision CSD) and perhaps some counties. There are also rules based on cell size, in which case…
I am a relatively new user of PUMS data. I use the 2016 1 year estimate PUMS population data, subset it to a dataset include the individual data for a county within the age group of my interest (ffx). Then I need to calculate the population estimate of…
Table S1811 is a good comparison here because it lists economic characteristics of the population with a disability for those age 16+. If you look at the total universe counts for those with disabilities on that table, you will see that they are much…
Was looking at occupation data from PUMS, and also using the ESR variable.
If ESR=6, you are not in the labor force. I assumed that would mean that you had no OCCP value as well.
That assumption is wrong. Can someone explain why you'd have an OCCP code…
I am afraid that the Bureau actually miss handled there computation of MOE, if one is a frequentist, if one is a Bayesian that approach is even worse. On the frequentist, I had a debate with Bureau a long time ago, where they indicated that they realized…
Dear All--
The Census use of MOE in the ACS is very weak. One big problem is that they use the normal approximation for the values they publish with the main release. This results in absurd results such as 120+ - 200. Of course one cannot have a negative…