Dear David--
This is a huge problem in the ACS. In the staqndard publicshed numbers, they use the normal approximation to compute the putative standard errro, which they turn into a margin of error. However, for situations where the percent of given category…
Does anyone have a link to the ACS methodology for computing the Margin of Error for a 0 table cell ?
Thanks
Beth Jarosz and Jonathan Schroeder,
I'm facing a very similar issue to OP and am following up here to inquire whether you're aware of any research on the subject of estimating MOE for geographies derived from polygon intersections (i.e., in Beth…
Since the margin of error is unsigned, I would think that you should still use the sum-of-squares method when calculating aggregated MOEs. But I'm not a statistics expert.
Did you get an answer yet? Age and sex and race are controlled by estimates IIRC so there’s no margin of error unless you’re getting into more detail than the published age-race-Hispanic-sex estimates
Using replicate weights, in general, will result in quite low standard deviations compared to the published numbers that the Census puts out. This is especially true for income, since income is, of course highly skewed and if one follows a reasonable…
Hello all,
Does anyone know of any resources that examine measurement error in the decennial long form? I know the Census did not publish margins of error per se.
Thanks for any assistance.
Two things:
1 - Tim is right. Total population for a county is an estimate from PopEst, and doesn't have sampling error, so margin of (statistical) error is 0.
2 - Formula for calculating aggregated MOE is the same whether you're summing or subtracting…
I would love to know the answer to this.
This is a very interesting table note to an ACS table.
This table, of sex by age
https://data.census.gov/cedsci/table?t=Populations%20and%20People&g=0400000US36&d=ACS%205-Year%20Estimates%20Detailed%20Tables&tid=ACSDT5Y2018.B01001&hidePreview=true…